Welcome to Teachers At Risk
-
Mar
28
Schools need to do more to protect students from road rage on the digital highway
Filed Under "At-risk" students, Blogging in and out of the Classroom, Bullying, Computers In The Classroom, maintaining a safe
Hardly a week goes by that I don’t read or hear about the problems school officials must deal with now that students are on the digital highway and can access sites like Facebook, MSN-Messenger, MySpace, and YouTube from anywhere. Students use these sites to vent their rage about adult authority figures or post offending comments about fellow students. Of course schools have always had to deal with those students who are disrespectful to adults or bully , harass or name-call their peers. and have developed codes of conduct in an attempt to stop this behaviour, but I believe they need to do more than this. They need to teach kids defensive driving strategies while they are navigating the digital highway.There have to be expectations and requirements for on-line behaviour just like there have to be expectations and requirements for off-line behaviour. We can’t just advise or expect students to use common sense when traveling the digital highway because we all know that common sense isn’t as common as we’d wish. The requirements for on-line behaviour need to be stated plainly so there is no doubt about what is acceptable behaviour and what isn’t. In fact now that I think about it, the requirements for on-line conduct should be posted above computers to remind stuents about the required on-line behaviour just like there are traffic signs posted on the road side to remind drivers on highways of the speed limit. We all need reminders.
My Board, the one I now the best, has the following requirement for on-line conduct:
when using electronic resources students must demonstrate appropriate on-line conduct/manners and refrain from improper/unethical use of technology, including computer hacking. Internet use for any purpose which is contrary to the school’s Code of Conduct is strictly prohibited. This includes all forms of violence, threats and harassment directed at the students or school. This applies to school, work and home Internet use.
Now that seems pretty clear; no violence, no threats, no harassment. Notice however, that the no violence, no threats, no harassments requirement applies when using the Internet at home and at work not just at school. Let me say that again: The no violence, no threats, no harrassments requirement applies when using the Internet at home and at work, not just at school. Most students aren’t aware of this. They tend to think what they do at home is none of the school’s business. But, it is the schools business because the insults, threats and harassments wherever they originate disrupt the learning and teaching in the school and need to be stopped.
Some students don’t realize that the Internet is a public place where free speech is limited to prevent libel and slander. They think they have the right to say anything they want, even if their comments are derogatory. They don’t realize that freedom of speech does not include being able to threaten and insult others. There are laws against that. One student who found himself suspended along with three other students because of their derogatory on-line remarks argued:
As long as the person who you’re talking about doesn’t get it; as long as you’re not e-mailing them, as long as you’re not messaging them and telling them what you’re saying, then it’s all right to an extent..If you’re talking about killing them and beating them up, that’s a different story, but we were not doing that.
Oh, it’s OK to say nasty things about people behind their back just as long as you don’t say it to their face? That’s not the way the law works. I guess you could argue that these students are just kids and as kids they are bound to make errors in judgment so maybe they shouldn’t be judged harshly.
Marshall Korenblum a psychiatrist specializing in children’s mental health argues:
Part of adolescence is to be sarcastic, part of adolescence is bravado, part of adolescence is just being silly…so adolescents will say and write a lot of sayings they don’t mean literally or seriously as we adults might take them to be. And from that point of view I think we have to cut the kids some slack in terms of their freedom of expression.”
So how much slack should these kids be cut? They called a vice-principal a fat penguin and said that you’d have to divide her into pieces and individually weigh the parts of her body so you could see how much she weighed . Since I don’t know all the details, I’m not going to comment. I do know that the Safe Schools policy in our board maintains:
harassment and physical, verbal (oral or written) sexual or psychological abuse; bullying; or discrimination on the basis of faith, gender, socioeconomic status, ability, age, sexual orientation or any other attribute is unacceptable…
Any student who demonstrates behaviour inconsistent with Board policy or the school Code of Conduct will face consequences which may include loss of privileges, detention, community service, making restitution, suspension or full expulsion from any school in the province.
So there you have it: the behaviour requirements and the consequences should students choose not to respect them. When students complain about the consequences they must suffer for their inappropriate behaviour, I tell them to make better choices because better choices lead to better consequences. It’s as simple as that.
Some people argue that by suspending or expelling students, school officials are preventing students from getting an education. This is not the case. There are alternative programs such as the Fresh Start program in my Board that kids who are expelled from the regular system can attend and earn credits toward graduation. I’ve had students who attended the Fresh Start program. They were very humbled by the whole experience and appreciated the fact that they could continue their education.
So far I’ve discussed what schools do to try to stop people from harming others. But I don’t think that is enough. I think more needs to be done to teach unsuspecting kids how to protect themselves from others who intend to harm by them using the Internet. We need programs for kids teaching them how to protect themselves from this type of abuse like the programs we have teaching kids how to protect themselves from bullies in the hallways.
I want to conclude by saying that schools have some responsibility for teaching students how to manage their lives in ways that keep them safe. Students need to know exactly what conduct is expected when on-line, and the consequences of not meeting these expectations. Schools do have codes of conduct around Internet use and make it very clear what students can and cannot do, but they need to remind students more frequently what the expectations are and the resulting consequences for non-compliance. More importantly, schools need to teach kids self defense strategies they can use while on the Internet to protect themselves from those who wish to harm them.
Wait a minute. It just dawned on me when I said schools had some responsibility for teaching kids how to protect themselves on-line. I did said they had some responsibility, so that means they don’t have all the responsibility. It’s amazing, we’re back to that village again. You know the one I mean. The one that everyone always says it takes to raise a child.
I’ve noticed that the school is reaching out into the village, into the work place and into the homes to set requirements for acceptable behavior for young people. The village needs to reach into the school and support the school in it’s effort to prevent students from being harmed or abused by people on the Internet. The village needs to join schools in teaching students Internet self-defense strategies so they can protect themselves from abuse and harm. The more things change, the more things stay the same.
Related Posts
Enjoyed reading this post? Subscribe to Teachers at Risk.Comments
3 Responses to “Schools need to do more to protect students from road rage on the digital highway”
Leave a Reply
-
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
-
Edublog Awards
Toronto Reading Council
Monitoring students activies in schools, homes and at work is indeed a problem. We can’t be with them in all those places. Teaching them right thing to do in the internet is the only thing possible while the rest is up to their judgement.
That’s something hard to do. I guess if you hire a personal nanny for the student who would follow him everwhere he goes, then it’s possible.
It’s not just the school’s responsibility to teach to right conduct and manners to students when in the internet but also the responsibility of parents.
Frank,
you’re absolutely right when you say teaching kids to do the right thing is one thing, using sound judgment is another. Peer pressure
is very powerful.
Ed,
Sometimes I feel like a nanny to my teenage students. Parents and schools need to work together. That’s for sure.